Creationism vs carbon 14 dating Recorded sexcams


01-Sep-2020 20:58

For it to work the simple mathematical reality of solving all equations with one unknown produces the following conundrum.The left hand side of an equation has to balance against the right hand side so that when we state 3X = 9, the unknown X can easily be calculated.But Nature News et al still believe the world is very old, so what problems could they report for this well known method?To understand this we need to look at the method and its continually revisable history. Carbon dating is a method of estimating the age of organic matter by measuring the amount of radioactive carbon (C14) in the item.So what to do with an atmosphere in which C14/C12 is not yet in equilibrium?

Since then they have tried stalactite growth patterns and coral growth lines to calibrate the clock, yet got nowhere near the 70,000 years, no in despite confident claims on BBC documentaries, National Geographic, etc. In the continuing search for a longer record, they have now studied lake sediment layers containing Carbon rich leaves to get a more accurate and longer time clock.

The method is commonly used to argue objects are up to 70,000 years old, so why does it need an update?

Cross Checking Carbon 14 When the method was first possible dates from the method were cross checked, or calibrated, by comparing C14 measurements from artefacts of known ages, such as Egyptian mummies and bread from Pompeii, but recorded history went nowhere near 30 thousand, 40 thousand, or the now used 70 thousand years.

When animals and plants are alive they take both ordinary carbon (C12) and radioactive carbon ( C14) into their body through their food and through the air they breathe, so the amount of C14 in their body is similar to what is in the environment.

When they die they cease taking in carbon of any kind.

But it is obvious they are still a way short of 70,000 years.